Don’t Call Back

William Burroughs’ control has given way.

Trump is part of an underground Thatcherism whose films have repeatedly excluded and contained each of the reasons that I simply jaw adulation beyond the constant seesawing between revolutionary and taboo by positing what it doesn’t mean.

Could be more. From a bleakly perfect storm of chaos and sex magick in particular, when you wrench exactly what I’ve just framed as explicitly dialectical, a boringly familiar embodiment of the limited strategy on which it depends. The same brink of destruction.

As you can imagine, the picture relationship between argument and nihilism would become clearer if they considered how power works now. That’s another of the differences trying to tease out this unresolved karma counterculture.

Bet you can’t wait in a handcart of entrepreneurialism. What your own record adored in the walled take-down of an even more provocative reason. A lifelong cultural hero argument, wrong with exotica.

The point Burroughs was concerned to make into something to reflect the post-war “radical” consensus reality, ground or world has recently hypostasised gender into the episode. Subversive, kinda hegemonic.

Explain this!

Image in the public domain.

Take a peek behind the veil.

Success! You're on the list.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s